Table 3. Comparison of classification accuracy with four benchmarks %.

	Arousal	Valence
Chen et al. [41]	74.88	82.36
Alhagry et al. [42]	85.56	85.54
Yang et al. [43]	90.42	89.54
Yin et al. [43]	90.54	90.06
Proposed method	95.36	95.31