Table 3. Comparison of previous reported results with our proposed work.

Dataset used	Author	Method Used	Accuracy
BreakHis	Spanhol et al. [12]	Artificial Neural Network	83.3%
		Quadratic Discrimination Analysis	87.9%
		SVM	86.1%
		Random Forest	84.8%
BreakHis	Deniz et al. [19]	Transfer Learning	92.04%
BreakHis	Spanhol et al. [20]	CNN	92.03%
ICML	Janowczyk et al. [21]	CNN	76.5%
ICML	Angel et al. [22]	CNN	84.23%
BreakHis	Our proposed model	Efficient Net B3	94.10%
ICML	Our proposed model	Efficient Net B3	82.9%